One paper at the Lifelong Learning conference that was very interesting, but that I’ve only got a few notes on was by Mandy Lupton, talking about early findings from her research into music students’ “ways of experiencing the relationship between information literacy and learning.” I’ve not got many notes partly because it wasn’t a paper in the proceedings and partly because I was chairing the session, so I was trying to keep alert as to timing and so forth and trying to think of a question to ask in case non-one else did (but actually there was lots of discussion on this). Mandy’s research shows, like our own, that “information” is experienced very differently depending on which discipline you are working in, and also that there is variation between different people’s experience (she is also using phenomenography as her research approach). So for music students, information can be in sounds and patterns, as well as more conventional sorts of things: therefore also information literacy is experienced differently. I may be seeing Mandy again next week, so I might be able to ask her more then. A book by Mandy that I’ve mentioned before is The learning connection, published by Auslib Press, based on her work for her research masters.
Photo by Sheila Webber: Port Julia cliff/beach, South Australia, June 2006.
Thursday, June 29, 2006
Pherotones
Some weeks ago I drafted an entry about a site that people might have taken seriously, but was actually a marketing ploy. I held it up as the site seemed to disappear ... but now it's back. It purports to tell you about scientific research which has resulted in being able to download ringtones that make you irrestistable to the opposite sex. I think the NYT article will be there, anyway. The Pherotones website http://www.pherotones.com/index.php originated as a blog, that for a short while people took seriously, and eventually emerged as promotion (example of buzz marketing, because people were linking to it and telling each other about it) for Oasys Mobile. Also an article about it:
Bosman, J. (2006) Fakin' it: a marketer intends to tease consumers New York times, 16 Feb.
Wikipedia was conned by it for a while but I now can't even find the page where it said that the information had been removed.
Photo by Sheila Webber: Yellow roses, , back in Sheffield, UK, June 2006.
Bosman, J. (2006) Fakin' it: a marketer intends to tease consumers New York times, 16 Feb.
Wikipedia was conned by it for a while but I now can't even find the page where it said that the information had been removed.
Photo by Sheila Webber: Yellow roses, , back in Sheffield, UK, June 2006.
Tuesday, June 27, 2006
Evaluating information literacy
On the first full day of the Lifelong Learning conference in Yeppoon, Vivienne Bernath gave a presentation authored by her and Joyce Jenkin, from Monash University Library, Evaluation in curriculum development for information literacy: an Australian example using a Canadian questionnaire. They wanted to assess the skill levels of incoming students to a Health Sciences course. With permission, they adapted the multiple-choice questionnaire which was developed by Diane Mittermeyer and her colleagues and administered to incoming students at universities in Quebec, Canada. The adapted questionnaire retained a number of the same questions, but with some tweaking to make them suitable for Australian rather than Canadian students. The questionnaire targets different areas of information literacy with different questions e.g. some aim to reveal students knowledge about search strategy.
At Monash the questionnaire was administered at the start and finish of a module that included some information literacy education. The results of the first test were also fed back to students and used to lead into a session on scholarly information. This use of the results to help students reflect and understand seems to me a more valuable way of using tests like this than trying to draw too many conclusions about what the tests say about the students’ information literacy. In the paper of their talk, Vivienne and Joyce say that you have to be careful in interpreting results, as it is not certain that the questions are necessarily measuring what was intended “Terminology [used in the questionnaire], ambiguity, and a “librarian perspective” in setting questions and answers can affect the results while not discriminating between levels of information literacy”.
When comparing the pre and post tests, some students’ knowledge about scholarly literature and about acknowledging sources appeared to have improved in particular, but (as expected) it showed that understanding in all areas cannot be achieved by IL education embedded into one module. Apart from helping students to reflect on their IL, the tests were also useful in raising academics’ awareness of IL needs. The authors said that “Perhaps the most useful outcome of the present evaluation process has been its contribution to the review of IL in the curriculum of another course” where academics would otherwise make assumptions about students’ IL levels.
Monash University (2005) Evaluation of information literacy 2005. http://www.lib.monash.edu.au/reports/infolit-evaluation-2005/
Mittermeyer, D. and Quirion, D. (2003) Information literacy: study of incoming first year undergraduates in Quebec. http://crepuq.qc.ca/documents/bibl/formation/studies_Ang.pdf
Photo by Sheila Webber: Footsteps in the sand (mine) on Great Keppel Island, Queensland.
At Monash the questionnaire was administered at the start and finish of a module that included some information literacy education. The results of the first test were also fed back to students and used to lead into a session on scholarly information. This use of the results to help students reflect and understand seems to me a more valuable way of using tests like this than trying to draw too many conclusions about what the tests say about the students’ information literacy. In the paper of their talk, Vivienne and Joyce say that you have to be careful in interpreting results, as it is not certain that the questions are necessarily measuring what was intended “Terminology [used in the questionnaire], ambiguity, and a “librarian perspective” in setting questions and answers can affect the results while not discriminating between levels of information literacy”.
When comparing the pre and post tests, some students’ knowledge about scholarly literature and about acknowledging sources appeared to have improved in particular, but (as expected) it showed that understanding in all areas cannot be achieved by IL education embedded into one module. Apart from helping students to reflect on their IL, the tests were also useful in raising academics’ awareness of IL needs. The authors said that “Perhaps the most useful outcome of the present evaluation process has been its contribution to the review of IL in the curriculum of another course” where academics would otherwise make assumptions about students’ IL levels.
Monash University (2005) Evaluation of information literacy 2005. http://www.lib.monash.edu.au/reports/infolit-evaluation-2005/
Mittermeyer, D. and Quirion, D. (2003) Information literacy: study of incoming first year undergraduates in Quebec. http://crepuq.qc.ca/documents/bibl/formation/studies_Ang.pdf
Photo by Sheila Webber: Footsteps in the sand (mine) on Great Keppel Island, Queensland.
Various types of blogging
A quick musing-about-blogging entry. I can't remember whether I said that earlier in the year I discovered that there was someone in the Education Department of Sheffield University who is also a Blogger on Blogger at http://drkatesartyfacts.blogspot.com/
It's quite exciting discovering a fellow blogger, I think. Anyway, looking at her blog and blogs she links to and the comments theron made me think how this blog looks a lot less personal and passionate than blogs where there is more of a personal thread and more frequent commenting between bloggers.
With this blog, although I know there are people who find it useful, like the photos etc., I wouldn't expect them to keep saying "this is useful" , and indeed when I find other similar blogs (like the ones linked on the right) useful, I don't usually actually comment on the blog itself. What I would rather tend to do is make an entry linking to the other blog. Obviously this has a lot to do with the nature of this blog i.e. that it is more of a "knowledge blog" focusing on a subject area. On the other hand, I do feel quite ...um ... passionate about this blog (or do I mean obsessive), and also the photos provide a parallel, more personal, thread, since they at least give an indication of where I am geographically. Anyway, I still think blogging is an interesting medium, and it's fascinating to see different approaches and conventions arising about how people use them.
Photo by Sheila Webber: Early morning, Port Julia, South Australia.
It's quite exciting discovering a fellow blogger, I think. Anyway, looking at her blog and blogs she links to and the comments theron made me think how this blog looks a lot less personal and passionate than blogs where there is more of a personal thread and more frequent commenting between bloggers.
With this blog, although I know there are people who find it useful, like the photos etc., I wouldn't expect them to keep saying "this is useful" , and indeed when I find other similar blogs (like the ones linked on the right) useful, I don't usually actually comment on the blog itself. What I would rather tend to do is make an entry linking to the other blog. Obviously this has a lot to do with the nature of this blog i.e. that it is more of a "knowledge blog" focusing on a subject area. On the other hand, I do feel quite ...um ... passionate about this blog (or do I mean obsessive), and also the photos provide a parallel, more personal, thread, since they at least give an indication of where I am geographically. Anyway, I still think blogging is an interesting medium, and it's fascinating to see different approaches and conventions arising about how people use them.
Photo by Sheila Webber: Early morning, Port Julia, South Australia.
Saturday, June 24, 2006
University of Queensland
On Thursday night I had dinner with Keith Webster who has just started as Director of Libraries and Learning at the University of Queensland, Brisbane. He used to be Librarian at Wellington University in New Zealand, but I know him from before that when he was in the UK and we were both heavily involved in the Institute of Information Scientists. Therefore there was a little bit of nostalgia (especially as the IIS got swallowed up in a merger with the Library Association to form CILIP) but also more recent catching up. Like the other universities in Bribane, there is a good deal of information literacy activity at UQ. As a web link I'll give you their "How to" guides page: http://www.library.uq.edu.au/useit/index.html
I'm blogging at the moment from a dial-up connection in my aunt's in Port Julia, South Australia - it's a lovely place, but gosh, dial up seems slow, I'd forgotten!
Photo by Sheila Webber: Noisy Miner bird on a Bird of Paradise flower, Brisbane, June 2006.
I'm blogging at the moment from a dial-up connection in my aunt's in Port Julia, South Australia - it's a lovely place, but gosh, dial up seems slow, I'd forgotten!
Photo by Sheila Webber: Noisy Miner bird on a Bird of Paradise flower, Brisbane, June 2006.
Student centred learning?
Ann Luzeckyj, from the University of South Australia, (pictured right with Li Wang (left) from Aukland University) was one of the winners of the “best conference paper” awards at the Lifelong Learning conference in Yeppoon. Her presentation was called What is at the centre of the discourse about student centred learning?. It was based on work she is doing for her doctorate, and she was looking at the ways in which the terms “lifelong learning” and “student centred learning” were being used and interpreted. She is using critical discourse analysis for this part of her work - so that involves close analysis of the literature and documents that are using the terms.
Obviously “Lifelong learning” is a concept that people often revisit in this conference! I think I already mentioned AndrĂ© Grace’s keynote, which included tracing the changing meaning of lifelong learning, varying between education for social and educational empowerment, to a means of readying the workforce etc. Ann identified the way in which current educational bodies refer to education like a commodity which can be grown, developed, exported etc. - a shift away from seeing it as a “democratic entitlement.” In this context, lifelong learning becomes a a way of training “human capital” to support economic development.
Ann explored the concept of “student centred learning”, where institutions are seen as responsible for preparing students to be active learners, and then the responsibility for learning is placed on the individual learner. Ann cited Rose talking about the “responsibilisation of individuals” with people being seen as having a duty to improve their lot and contribute to the wellbeing of the country. Ann also linked this in with an interesting critique of the “sage on the stage vs. guide on the side” view of teaching - but I think I’ll save that for another posting. I must say I enjoy the lifelong learning conference as it does allow for more reflective discussion about what’s happening in education, rather than focusing just on “practical” issues.
The Rose reference is: Rose, N. (1999) Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni Press. (nb I haven’t read this myself!)
Obviously “Lifelong learning” is a concept that people often revisit in this conference! I think I already mentioned AndrĂ© Grace’s keynote, which included tracing the changing meaning of lifelong learning, varying between education for social and educational empowerment, to a means of readying the workforce etc. Ann identified the way in which current educational bodies refer to education like a commodity which can be grown, developed, exported etc. - a shift away from seeing it as a “democratic entitlement.” In this context, lifelong learning becomes a a way of training “human capital” to support economic development.
Ann explored the concept of “student centred learning”, where institutions are seen as responsible for preparing students to be active learners, and then the responsibility for learning is placed on the individual learner. Ann cited Rose talking about the “responsibilisation of individuals” with people being seen as having a duty to improve their lot and contribute to the wellbeing of the country. Ann also linked this in with an interesting critique of the “sage on the stage vs. guide on the side” view of teaching - but I think I’ll save that for another posting. I must say I enjoy the lifelong learning conference as it does allow for more reflective discussion about what’s happening in education, rather than focusing just on “practical” issues.
The Rose reference is: Rose, N. (1999) Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni Press. (nb I haven’t read this myself!)
Thursday, June 22, 2006
IL strategy
Another report of a paper from the Lifelong Learning conference in Yeppoon, Australia (see right for photo of fisherman on the Yeppoon beach). Clare Granville presented a paper by her and Rae-Anne Locke of Griffith University. They undertook a survey of the information literacy activities of librarians at their university and also interviewed them about what they would like to be doing. They found that librarians reported involvement in roughly a third of the degree programmes at Griffith. 52% of activities were in timetabled lectures and 34% in workshops or tutorials. There was a lot of involvement in first year, but less evidence of activities that were progressing information literacy through degree programmes.
In the interviews, librarians said they would like to do more e.g. “The approach I’d like to see is more integration with the curriculum, more developmental.” However, there wasn’t a clear strategy of how to achieve this. To move forward from this position, a planning day was held for Griffith librarians, with involvement of the educational developers at Griffith too. They reflected on the results of the IL surveys, started to reformulate their definition and vision for IL at Griffith, and identified strategies and targets for IL. One of the lessons for me is that you need to keep working on and revisiting your strategy for IL even if it feels like you are doing quite well, as Griffith had developed a “Blueprint for IL” relatively early (1994), has done a good deal of work in this area, and, as can be seen from the survey, has achieved quite a bit compared with some universities. You might like to look at their Information Literacy toolkit at http://www.griffith.edu.au/centre/gihe/
griffith_graduate/toolkit/infoLit/why.htm which has quotes from students, examples of assessment etc.
The paper was called “Crossing the divide: information literacy values and practices of Griffith University librarians.” In due course the ppts will be made available on the LLL conf website
In the interviews, librarians said they would like to do more e.g. “The approach I’d like to see is more integration with the curriculum, more developmental.” However, there wasn’t a clear strategy of how to achieve this. To move forward from this position, a planning day was held for Griffith librarians, with involvement of the educational developers at Griffith too. They reflected on the results of the IL surveys, started to reformulate their definition and vision for IL at Griffith, and identified strategies and targets for IL. One of the lessons for me is that you need to keep working on and revisiting your strategy for IL even if it feels like you are doing quite well, as Griffith had developed a “Blueprint for IL” relatively early (1994), has done a good deal of work in this area, and, as can be seen from the survey, has achieved quite a bit compared with some universities. You might like to look at their Information Literacy toolkit at http://www.griffith.edu.au/centre/gihe/
griffith_graduate/toolkit/infoLit/why.htm which has quotes from students, examples of assessment etc.
The paper was called “Crossing the divide: information literacy values and practices of Griffith University librarians.” In due course the ppts will be made available on the LLL conf website
Wednesday, June 21, 2006
ALA conference sessions
At the lifelong learning conference last week someone pointed out that there was a session at the American Library Association conference in New Orleans on June 26th The Emperor Has No Clothes: Be It Resolved That Information Literacy Is a Fad and Waste of Librarians' Time and Talent. "Two teams will debate the relevance of information literacy as we know it. Is information literacy a concept created by academic librarians to make themselves more relevant to the curriculum or is it one of our more important roles? This debate will test our assumptions and beliefs about a core element of the academic librarians' role in the educational process." Personally I think this is a bit pointless (haven't we got past the point of being defensive about it?), but there you go.
There is another session on the same day that sounds more interesting Doing Information Literacy Differently: The View from Interdisciplinary Studies "Interdisciplinary subject areas like women's studies, African-American studies, Chicana/o studies, and American Indian studies present unique opportunities for adapting and using the ACRL Information Literacy Competency Standards. Panelists will discuss using and adapting the standards in interdisciplinary areas focusing on undergraduate credit bearing courses, online modules, and work with graduate students. After the panel, break-out groups will brainstorm further ideas for using and adapting the standards in interdisciplinary areas." There are other IL sessions on previous days of the conference too. See http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/
acrlevents/acrlatannual/ACRLannprog.htm
Photo by Sheila Webber: Lorikeets on Great Keppel Island, June 2006.
There is another session on the same day that sounds more interesting Doing Information Literacy Differently: The View from Interdisciplinary Studies "Interdisciplinary subject areas like women's studies, African-American studies, Chicana/o studies, and American Indian studies present unique opportunities for adapting and using the ACRL Information Literacy Competency Standards. Panelists will discuss using and adapting the standards in interdisciplinary areas focusing on undergraduate credit bearing courses, online modules, and work with graduate students. After the panel, break-out groups will brainstorm further ideas for using and adapting the standards in interdisciplinary areas." There are other IL sessions on previous days of the conference too. See http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/
acrlevents/acrlatannual/ACRLannprog.htm
Photo by Sheila Webber: Lorikeets on Great Keppel Island, June 2006.
Tuesday, June 20, 2006
Central Queensland University
Today I'm visiting Central Queensland University, which is a 35 min bus ride from Yeppoon. It's a university with a good number of distance learning students and international students. The visit was with Leone Hinton, who manages the Educational Services and Learning Support section here. She gave a presentation at the lifelong learning conference in which she reflected on approaches to information literacy and librarians in the curriculum. One of her ideas for the future is having a librarian seconded to work within the educational development unit and as part of academic teaching teams.
A random paper by Leone that I found via Google ;-) reflecting on use of Blackboard:
Rossi, D. and Hinton, L. (2005) "Reflections on Practice: Course Development & Online Teaching." Studies in Learning, Evaluation, Innovation and Development, 2 (2). http://sleid.cqu.edu.au/viewarticle.php?id=57
You can also see Leone in some nice little video clips which are in an online tutorial on the literature review at http://www.library.cqu.edu.au/tutorials/litreviewpages/index.htm (in a couple of the Stages of the Literature review) . The contact for this tutorial, by the way, is Debbie Orr who is in the library at CQU and who was one of the key people organising the Lifelong Learning Conference.
Photo by Sheila Webber: Leaf, Yeppoon, June 2006, when it was still sunny.
A random paper by Leone that I found via Google ;-) reflecting on use of Blackboard:
Rossi, D. and Hinton, L. (2005) "Reflections on Practice: Course Development & Online Teaching." Studies in Learning, Evaluation, Innovation and Development, 2 (2). http://sleid.cqu.edu.au/viewarticle.php?id=57
You can also see Leone in some nice little video clips which are in an online tutorial on the literature review at http://www.library.cqu.edu.au/tutorials/litreviewpages/index.htm (in a couple of the Stages of the Literature review) . The contact for this tutorial, by the way, is Debbie Orr who is in the library at CQU and who was one of the key people organising the Lifelong Learning Conference.
Photo by Sheila Webber: Leaf, Yeppoon, June 2006, when it was still sunny.
Monday, June 19, 2006
Panning for Gold
Am getting my breath after the conference ... by walking on the beach here at Yeppoon, which is a rather pleasant way to do it. I've also discovered where to plug my memory stick in the internet/book shop computer... (see below) ... so on with the postings. On Thursday at the conference Sylvia Edwards launched the book which is based on her doctoral work. It’s:
Edwards, S. (2006) Panning for gold: information literacy and the net lenses model. Adelaide: Auslib Press. ISBN 1875145605. Price $55 Australian plus postage and packing. The Auslib Press website is at http://www.auslib.com.au/
Sylvia undertook phenomenographic research into the ways in which university students approach internet searching. She identified four categories, with information searching seen as 1) looking for a needle in a haystack; 2) finding a way through a maze; 3) using the tools as a filter; 4) panning for gold. Her book describes her research journey, the phenomenographic approach to research, and the ways she has applied the research in her teaching (e.g. in assessment and in devloping an online environment), as well as the research outcomes. On the right, Sylvia is pictured with the book. You can access some of Sylvia’s papers online on the Queensland University of Technology website (where she is a lecturer) http://eprints.qut.edu.au/view/person/Edwards,_Sylvia.html
Edwards, S. (2006) Panning for gold: information literacy and the net lenses model. Adelaide: Auslib Press. ISBN 1875145605. Price $55 Australian plus postage and packing. The Auslib Press website is at http://www.auslib.com.au/
Sylvia undertook phenomenographic research into the ways in which university students approach internet searching. She identified four categories, with information searching seen as 1) looking for a needle in a haystack; 2) finding a way through a maze; 3) using the tools as a filter; 4) panning for gold. Her book describes her research journey, the phenomenographic approach to research, and the ways she has applied the research in her teaching (e.g. in assessment and in devloping an online environment), as well as the research outcomes. On the right, Sylvia is pictured with the book. You can access some of Sylvia’s papers online on the Queensland University of Technology website (where she is a lecturer) http://eprints.qut.edu.au/view/person/Edwards,_Sylvia.html
Saturday, June 17, 2006
Distance learning and business blogging
I was intending to upload a photo and item about the Yeppoon Lifelong Learning conference from my memory stick, but I can't find the place to stick it in this computer in an internet/bookshop .... so I'll post an Entry I Prepared Earlier, namely: the latest issue of Freepint has got an article on distance learning ("Distance learning as a collaborative enterprise: Tips on teamwork to make the class work") and an interview with IBM's chief blogger. As someone who also teaches marketing, I find these business perspectives on blogging interesting, and I think it's also helpful for consumers to think about what businesses like IBM are aiming to do with their blogs. The issue (no.207) is at http://www.freepint.com/issues/080606.pdf
Photo by Sheila Webber: Tree at the end of my road, Sheffield, UK, June 2006.
Photo by Sheila Webber: Tree at the end of my road, Sheffield, UK, June 2006.
Thursday, June 15, 2006
LLL day 2
I am spending too much time at the conference to be able to blog it ... today was the information literacy "symposium" with 9 different presentations, mostly relating to IL research in different contexts. The end of the symposium was a "talking circle" in which we talked about why we continued engaging with IL and what our dreams were ... lots of interesting thoughts, including ones to do with empowering students, making connections, learning from others, helping people to learn, helping people to do their jobs, being subversive... I'll blog about the actual papers in the future
Photo by Sheila Webber: A brolga in the grounds of the Rydges resort, where the conference is taking place. The brolgas mostly seemed interested in stealing people's lunch.
Photo by Sheila Webber: A brolga in the grounds of the Rydges resort, where the conference is taking place. The brolgas mostly seemed interested in stealing people's lunch.
Wednesday, June 14, 2006
Lifelong Learning day 1
A quick report during the first full day of the Lifelong Learning Conference being held in Yeppoon, Australia. On the right is a rather poor photograph of the poolside reception last night (the announcement had just been made that we could progress to the tables to eat, which is why people are turning eagerly away).
The first keynote paper was from Andre Grace, Alberta University, Canada, "Reflecting critically on lifelong learning in an era of neoliberal pragmatism: instrumental, social and cultural perspectives." It was a very interesting paper in which he considered the development of the concept of lifelong learning, and critiqued keynotes given at previous keynotes at the conference. This is the 4th LLL conference: previous ones were in 2000, 2002, and 2004. I've been to all of them from 2002 onwards, and it was valuable to be reminded of talks from previous years, but with the added critical perspective.
In terms of Andre's perspective on Lifelong Learning, he was noting the way in which the economic/vocational (rather than the personal, transformative) view of LLL often now dominates in international & national government discourse. This is where neoliberalism (if you focus on the economic perspective, other good things will follow) and pragmatism (focus on skill development for the knowledge economy) come in. In contrast, Andre saw the need for educators and "learner workers" to exercise their critical intelligence and not just see LLL as a means to being economically productive. Paulo Freire seems to get mentioned increasingly often, and Andre quoted his definition of critical intelligence "wakeful capacity for comprehending the new" (from Freire's Pedagogy of indignation.) All the ppts from this conference normally get put online, so in due course you'll be able to see this presentation.
I will postpone writing about the next session I attended as I'm shortly due to give a short talk about Information Literacy in the UK. I'm basing this in part on a paper I did with Claire McGuinness on IL in the UK and Ireland, for the UNESCO project on IL around the world at http://www.uv.mx/usbi_ver/unesco/ If you go to this site and click on Documents you'll see you can download the draft version of the "State of the art report" and my draft report is in that (I just submitted the updated version). It has reports on some other countries as well, obviously.
The first keynote paper was from Andre Grace, Alberta University, Canada, "Reflecting critically on lifelong learning in an era of neoliberal pragmatism: instrumental, social and cultural perspectives." It was a very interesting paper in which he considered the development of the concept of lifelong learning, and critiqued keynotes given at previous keynotes at the conference. This is the 4th LLL conference: previous ones were in 2000, 2002, and 2004. I've been to all of them from 2002 onwards, and it was valuable to be reminded of talks from previous years, but with the added critical perspective.
In terms of Andre's perspective on Lifelong Learning, he was noting the way in which the economic/vocational (rather than the personal, transformative) view of LLL often now dominates in international & national government discourse. This is where neoliberalism (if you focus on the economic perspective, other good things will follow) and pragmatism (focus on skill development for the knowledge economy) come in. In contrast, Andre saw the need for educators and "learner workers" to exercise their critical intelligence and not just see LLL as a means to being economically productive. Paulo Freire seems to get mentioned increasingly often, and Andre quoted his definition of critical intelligence "wakeful capacity for comprehending the new" (from Freire's Pedagogy of indignation.) All the ppts from this conference normally get put online, so in due course you'll be able to see this presentation.
I will postpone writing about the next session I attended as I'm shortly due to give a short talk about Information Literacy in the UK. I'm basing this in part on a paper I did with Claire McGuinness on IL in the UK and Ireland, for the UNESCO project on IL around the world at http://www.uv.mx/usbi_ver/unesco/ If you go to this site and click on Documents you'll see you can download the draft version of the "State of the art report" and my draft report is in that (I just submitted the updated version). It has reports on some other countries as well, obviously.
Tuesday, June 13, 2006
Lifelong learning conference
Just a quick posting to say that I've just registered at the Lifelong Learning Conference in Yeppoon, Australia. More reports will follow! I must say that good though the LILAC conference, for example, was, Yeppoon has certain benefits (e.g. sun, sea - see right photo from the terrace outside my room) that Leeds doesn't!
Sunday, June 11, 2006
IL and Law
Here's a short article written by a couple of colleagues in the law school here at Sheffield. They are talking about a CILASS (Centre for Inquiry Based Learning in the Arts and Social Sciences) project. Like me, Mark (Taylor) was on the CILASS development team. The IL bit is very short, but it may be of interest to you.
Semmens, N. and Taylor, M. (2006) "CILASS: promoting inquiry-based learning and information literacy" Directions, (12).
http://www.ukcle.ac.uk/directions/previous/issue12/cilass.html
Photo by Sheila Webber:Wild rose at the end of the road, Photoshop smudge stick effect (as it was a bit blurred)
Semmens, N. and Taylor, M. (2006) "CILASS: promoting inquiry-based learning and information literacy" Directions, (12).
http://www.ukcle.ac.uk/directions/previous/issue12/cilass.html
Photo by Sheila Webber:Wild rose at the end of the road, Photoshop smudge stick effect (as it was a bit blurred)
i-skills follow-up
The following is copied from a posting by Helen Conroy to the lis-infoliteracy list. "JISC has funded Netskills to run a series of free workshops as part of the Staff Information Skills Set programme, aimed at university/ college managers and administrators. Two projects (based at Leeds and Loughborough Universities) have also been funded to exemplify the 'i-skills' model in specific job roles. The Netskills programme aims to disseminate the JISC 'i-skills' publications (http://www.jisc.ac.uk/cpdresources), along with promoting the importance of these skills in the workplace. A self-assessment will form part of the core materials of the day, which will later be made available to institutions as a 'toolkit'. The toolkit will include pointers to development opportunities and relevant resources, which institutions could tailor to job roles and to point to their own resources. " Details of the events at :
http://www.netskills.ac.uk/cgi-bin/stop-press?168
Photo by Sheila Webber: Frog detail on building, central Stockholm, April 2006.
http://www.netskills.ac.uk/cgi-bin/stop-press?168
Photo by Sheila Webber: Frog detail on building, central Stockholm, April 2006.
Friday, June 09, 2006
Social software and learning
An interesting (from a quick skim) report from Future Lab: Social software and learning (Martin Owen, Lyndsay Grant, Steve Sayers and Keri Facer). There are explanations of the terms, commentary and useful links/references. Apparently we may be moving from e-learning to c-learning. One minor quibble is that I think people ought to stop illustrating reports like this just with moody shots of young urban males - as if old rural females didn't engage in learning & use social software too (oops, will attempt to get out of grumpy old person mode). Links from: http://www.futurelab.org.uk/
research/opening_education.htm
Photo by Sheila Webber: Purple marguerites in someone else's garden, June 2006.
research/opening_education.htm
Photo by Sheila Webber: Purple marguerites in someone else's garden, June 2006.
Thursday, June 08, 2006
ANZIIL Symposium: Transitions
The programme of the sixth ANZIIL symposium has been announced. The symposium is taking place in Brisbane, Australia, 5-6 July 2006, and the theme is Transitions, in particular the transitions between different kinds of education and between education and work. It has an excellent range of speakers, including me ;-) I'm off to Australia in a couple of days, so you will start to see photos of sandy beaches appearing on the blog shortly (I hope) as first stop for me is Yeppoon, Queensland, for the Lifelong Learning conference.
The programme for the ANZIIL conference is at
http://www.anziil.org/events_meetings/
2006/events/symposium-series-six/overview.htm
Photo by Sheila Webber: Rose in neighbour's garden, June 2006.
Tuesday, June 06, 2006
The Long Road Ahead: Information Literacy Instruction in Canada’s Public Libraries
Dr. Heidi Julien at the University of Alberta has made available a presentation she did for the Canadian Association of Information Scientists, entitled: "The Long Road Ahead: Information Literacy Instruction in Canada’s Public Libraries".
The presentation looks at the following questions regarding Canadian public libraries and information literacy:
The full presentation is available here.
The presentation looks at the following questions regarding Canadian public libraries and information literacy:
- What is happening in Canadian public libraries in terms of information literacy training?
- How are customers using Internet access provided in public libraries?
- How are public library customers becoming information literate?
- How do public library customers experience being information literate?
- Do public libraries play a role in the development of their customers’ information literacy?
The full presentation is available here.
Integrating Information Literacy in a First-Year University Course: A Case Study From Canada
Ganga Dakshinamurti and Lena Horne of the University of Manitoba presented an interesting paper in Seoul at IFLA 2006 entitled: "Integrating Information Literacy in a First-Year University Course: A Case Study from Canada". The case study describes the steps taken by the authors to integrate information literacy skills in a new curriculum and arrives at a listing of benefits for both the academic and academic librarian involved.
Full paper available here.
Full paper available here.
Sunday, June 04, 2006
Usability maturity
Thanks to Richard Wakeford for sending me an interview with web usability guru Jakob Nielsen, which appeared in the Guardian. It reminded me to revisit his website http://www.useit.com/ where I read about a couple of recent-ish surveys on how users use and scan web pages.However, it was the two short articles on the 8 stages of Usability Maturity that particularly caught my eye (these are in the Alertbox entries for April 24 and May 1st 2006). We used to use Nielsen’s usability heuristics as an exercise in the information literacy class at Strathclyde, as part of evaluating a website from different perspectives (see http://www.useit.com/papers/heuristic/heuristic_evaluation.html).
The 8 stages of Usability Maturity are: Stage 1: Hostility Toward Usability, Stage 2: Developer-Centered Usability; Stage 3: Skunkworks Usability (“What distinguishes this stage from higher levels is that there's no official recognition of usability, nor is there an approved budget allocated in advance. All usability activities are ad hoc and driven by user advocates who want a bit more data to improve the quality of the one thing they're working on at the moment.”); Stage 4: Dedicated Usability Budget (but management still “mainly views usability as a magic potion that's sprinkled sparsely over a user interface to shine it up”); Stage 5: Managed Usability; Stage 6: Systematic Usability Process (by this stage there is a more holistic approach to usability, and attention to usability is better integrated into business processes); Stage 7: Integrated User-Centered Design; and Stage 8: User-Driven Corporation.
Anyway, I thought that some of the elements could be applied to “information literacy” maturity as well. This ties up a bit to some work I did after my trip to Australia in the summer of 2002, when I used information and observation from interviews with Australian librarians to start developing stages towards the Information Literate University mentioned in my previous post.
The 8 stages of Usability Maturity are: Stage 1: Hostility Toward Usability, Stage 2: Developer-Centered Usability; Stage 3: Skunkworks Usability (“What distinguishes this stage from higher levels is that there's no official recognition of usability, nor is there an approved budget allocated in advance. All usability activities are ad hoc and driven by user advocates who want a bit more data to improve the quality of the one thing they're working on at the moment.”); Stage 4: Dedicated Usability Budget (but management still “mainly views usability as a magic potion that's sprinkled sparsely over a user interface to shine it up”); Stage 5: Managed Usability; Stage 6: Systematic Usability Process (by this stage there is a more holistic approach to usability, and attention to usability is better integrated into business processes); Stage 7: Integrated User-Centered Design; and Stage 8: User-Driven Corporation.
Anyway, I thought that some of the elements could be applied to “information literacy” maturity as well. This ties up a bit to some work I did after my trip to Australia in the summer of 2002, when I used information and observation from interviews with Australian librarians to start developing stages towards the Information Literate University mentioned in my previous post.
Friday, June 02, 2006
Recognising the need
This week has been very hectic and I realise that I still haven't posted up my PowerPoint from the conference at Staffordshire University. In fact my ppt, together with that of some of my copresenters are available now on the conference website at http://www.staffs.ac.uk/infolitconf/ You click on the speaker name to get to a page with links (for Andretta, Corrall, Boden, Bent or Webber). Susie Andretta's page also has reports from the breakout sessions. There some conference pictures: this one http://www.staffs.ac.uk/infolitconf/photos/infolit3.jpg includes me (third from the right with the long hair, my colleague Sheila Corrall is to my right). I have posted my own ppt Working towards the Information Literate University, as a pdf as well here. Pam McKinney (who had a poster about CILASS at the conference) wrote a little about Susie's talk (here). Moira Bent was talking mostly about the Information Literacy Forum at Newcastle University, which has encouraged academic staff to take more of an interest in developing information literacy initaitives. Debbie Boden talked about the need for librarians to have skills to support information literacy, and the virtual learning environment they have developed at Imperial College for this purpose. Sheila Corrall was identifying how startegic management theories could be applied to develop information literacy (afterwards a management lecturer from the audience came up and said how refreshing it was to see theory being advocated as practice!)
There was a book published of the proceedings: Walton, G. and Pope, A. (Eds) Information literacy: recognising the need. Staffordshire University, Stoke-on-Trent: 17 May 2006. Oxford: Chandos. ISBN 184334243X. £20 (for 63 pages) In my chapter, as well as expanding on what I talk about in the ppt, I list some factors or characteristics of universities at different levels of information literacy. This was something I worked on after I came back from Australia in 2002 but never got round to writing up properly. "Recognising the need" is the first of the SCONUL 7 Pillars of IL, by the way.
Photo by Sheila Webber: Mosaic water feature near Sheffield Hallam University.
There was a book published of the proceedings: Walton, G. and Pope, A. (Eds) Information literacy: recognising the need. Staffordshire University, Stoke-on-Trent: 17 May 2006. Oxford: Chandos. ISBN 184334243X. £20 (for 63 pages) In my chapter, as well as expanding on what I talk about in the ppt, I list some factors or characteristics of universities at different levels of information literacy. This was something I worked on after I came back from Australia in 2002 but never got round to writing up properly. "Recognising the need" is the first of the SCONUL 7 Pillars of IL, by the way.
Photo by Sheila Webber: Mosaic water feature near Sheffield Hallam University.
Thursday, June 01, 2006
Teaching Large Groups
There is a CILIP Workshop: Teaching large groups, on 5 July 2006, London, UK. The workshop leader is Barbara Allen. For more information go to http://www.cilip.org.uk/training/
training/2006/tl/
teachinglargegroupsprog
Photo by Sheila Webber: Betty's organic mouse bread.
training/2006/tl/
teachinglargegroupsprog
Photo by Sheila Webber: Betty's organic mouse bread.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)