Showing posts with label Information Behaviour. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Information Behaviour. Show all posts

Thursday, August 06, 2026

New articles: Assessment; Medical students; AI and primary source literacies; Critical infolit; Everyday Life Information Seeking

deep blue hydrangea blooms on the bush

The latest issue of open-access Communications in Information Literacy (vol 20 no. 1) is the first under the new editorial team. It comprises:
- Application of Information Literacy Skills to Everyday Life Information Seeking in College Students: Implications for Instruction by Stephanie Ward, Rachel Dineen, and Darren Ilett
- Assessment of Information Literacy Instruction in Reference: Applying VanScoy’s Conceptual and Procedural Framework in Practice by Vanessa Arce
- Exploring Information Literacy Skills, Attitudes, and Barriers Among Medical and Nursing Students in Bahrain: A Mixed-Methods Perspective by Asif Altaf, Suchita N. Dsilva, Simple Sibi Joseph, Fida Mukhtar, Muhammad Zeeshan, and Bindhu Nair
- "An Open Mind and a Critical Stance": A Content Analysis of Information Literacy Integration into a Course about Poverty and Discrimination by Ashley Shealy, C. Rebecca Oldham, Clay Oldham, and Tara L. Griffith
- Critical Information Literacy in Higher Education: An Evolution in Theory, Practice, and Assessment by Dan Williford
- Information Literacy Tutorials for High Enrollment Courses: An Iterative Design-Based Approach by Kimberly Casey and Rebekah Heleen
- The Spectrum of Authority: A New Approach to Teaching AI and Primary Source Literacies by Kristen Howard
- Research Matters: Problem-Setting: A Research Reflection Process by Merinda Kaye Hensley
Plus an editorial and a book review. Go to https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/comminfolit/vol20/iss1/
Photo by Sheila Webber: hydrangea in the park, July 2026

Tuesday, May 26, 2026

New articles: AI + IL; Data literacy; Gamification; Services to visually impaired; Virtual reference; International students

in thr forground white rhododrendron blossoms with a pink tinge and more blossoms in eth background
The latest issue of the Journal of Academic Librarianship (vol 52 issue 3) includes the following (priced, unless it says they are open access):
- How artificial intelligence is reshaping information literacy in academic libraries: A global Scientometric analysis (2020–2025) by Munazza Jabeen, Claudia Lux (open access)
- How academic libraries can intervene in the frustrating academic information seeking of international students in China by Ming Zhu, Yidang Wang, Yixuan Cao
- Librarians' understanding of instruction in virtual reference services: A just-in-time learning perspective by Nove E. Variant Anna, K. Kiran
- Supporting blind, visually impaired, and print disabled students: Are academic libraries doing enough? by Dick Kawooya et al.
- Breaking the ice: A social exchange study on gamification, library anxiety, and the willingness to return at the University of Malta Library by Ryan Scicluna (open access)
- Digital reference tools and information literacy: Adoption patterns among university communities and their implications for libraries by Shakir Khan, Saad Alzahrani, Nazia Salauddin
- From information to data literacy: Faculty readiness and alignment in the community college by Jeonghyun Kim, Brady Lund, Nelson Santana
Go to https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/the-journal-of-academic-librarianship/vol/52/issue/3
Photo by Sheila Webber: rhododendron, May 2026

Saturday, May 16, 2026

Multispecies Information Science

a garden withh a grey squirrel on a rock and human legs in teh background

A new book "shifting the focus beyond humans to explore the rich and complex realms of information and knowledge shared with animals, plants, microbes, technologies, and landscapes." It includes When animals teach: Lessons for information pedagogy and Urban dog parks as information grounds: A multispecies family perspective
Solhjoo, N. (Ed.) (2026). Multispecies Information Science. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Multispecies-Information-Science/Solhjoo/p/book/9781032951553
Photo by Sheila Webber: squirrel on a rock, April 2026

Tuesday, May 05, 2026

iConference proceedings published

pink cherry blossom cluster with green leaves against green grass

The proceedings of the iConference (held in March-April 2026) have been published as a special issue of open access journal Information Research (volume 31 no. iconf(2026). There's lots about AI! Papers include:
- Beyond the loop: a research agenda towards a framework for critical AI literacy in the AI-assisted literature review by Dipesh Jalui, Mary Tate, Jocelyn Cranefield 
- Disability misinformation on Facebook: a comparison of LLM-based fact-checking tools by Ian Prazak, Leah Padovani, Yool Lim, Julia (Hsin-Ping) Hsu, Myeong Lee 
- Shared agency in information behaviour research: Human–Nonhuman interactions by Niloofar Solhjoo, Jia Tina Du, Yazdan Mansourian 
- The role of misinformation in elder fraud: a conceptual framework by Jiangping Chen, Milo P. Ono 
- Breaking the mold of knowledge imposition: reconstruct the digital literacy education model in academic libraries under the Scottish enlightenment by ZhenJia Fan, YiMei He
 - Reframing creative learning: a conceptual framework for design literacy in the GenAI era by Asif H Zeshan, Xiao Hu 
- Dimensions of information search strategies: a study of blind and visually impaired users in mobile digital library environments by Iris Xie, Wonchan Choi, Hyun Seung Lee, Ning Chiao Wang, Bo Hyun Hong 
- Seeking the mission and opportunities for LIS in the AI era: a systematic review of empirical research on teenagers' artificial intelligence literacy (TAIL) by Jing Liu, Jiajing Ma, Guoye Sun, Shu Fan
 - Inclusive media and information literacy (IMIL): Building a framework for an age of preparedness and responsibilisation by Hanna Carlsson, Lisa Engström, Lisa Olsson Dahlquist 
- Scaffolding resilience: the influence of an iSchool’s media and information literacy courses by Frey Aura Galario, Dan Anthony Dorado, Benedict Salazar Olgado 
- ‘Ugh, it’s a difficult topic’: Positionality statements as information use in information and library science research by Alex H. Poole, Ashley Todd-Diaz
Go to https://publicera.kb.se/ir/issue/view/5744
Photo by Sheila Webber: cherry blossom cluster, April 2026

Tuesday, April 21, 2026

iConference posters published

a cream coloured cake with whirls of chocolate icing in a cardboard box
Posters from the iSchools conference (iConference) held in Edinburgh, Scotland and online in March 2026 have been published. Posters include: 
- The information literacy impact framework: Evaluation of modules teaching information literacy in context by Ryan, Bruce; Brazier, David; Ryan, Frances 
- Small Talk, Big Impact: Overcoming Polarization through Informal Information-Sharing in Third Places by Lanier, Amy 
- Coping with Inflation in the Age of Social Media: Economically-Disadvantaged Consumers’ Information Behavior on Reddit by Shelton, Amanda 
- The Role of Chatbot AI as an Intermediary for Processing Health Misinformation by Seo, Subin 
Go to https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/collections/2602
Photo by Sheila Webber: My birthday cake from earlier this month

Wednesday, April 01, 2026

"All mushrooms are edible but some only once": rethinking information literacy in leisure contexts through hobbyist mycology, Laura Williams. #Lilac26

 Laura Williams is a PhD student in the School of Information Journalism and Communication, but this presentation was not about her PhD topic; instead, this was a topic of personal interest to her. Laura created a Zine as a way to cope with semester 1 library teaching, and this stimulated the presentation today. This is a conceptual paper, that isn't based on research other than reading lots of literatyre about mushroom hobbyists, and Laura's growing interest in mushroom foraging. This is an information-rich hobby: enthusiasts learn about mushrooms, they spot mushrooms and photograph them, go to mushroom social events. Is hobbyist mycology a risky hobby? Yes even the most experienced mycologiest need to continually update their knowledge of mushrooms to avoid dangerous encounters. Laura reviewed the current literature on hobbyist mycology to identify the information aspects to this. Laura dtaws on Lloyd's work to define Il as a socially enacted practice, and Hicks' book on risk in information literacy. Risk-informed information practice focuses on everyday information literacy, but Laura wants to apply these ideas to a leisure context, as much information science literature about leisure hobbies focuses on the joy of the hobby and sharing information.

There hasn't been much research on fungi from an information perspective. There is a growing body of literature on multispecies information literacy, and fungi are mentioned as a fascinating area to look at as they are neither animals or plants. There is a body of literature on risky leisure practices, but information literacy isn't mentioned often or drawn on, even though information is a theme explored in the research. Risk is conceptualised as a balance between potential harm and the desired benefits. Information literacy: the mushroom itself is a source of information (drawing on Bates ideas of what is information). Laura has identified 6 ways that information literacy is enacted to manage risk

Rules of thumb: quick and personal rules to assist decision-making, e.g. "never munch on a hunch". But the problem with these is that they take time to develop and are difficult to share with others, and can be affected by complacency.

Folkways: folk knowledge of mycology and folk practices such as hunting and foraging. The common names of mushrooms are linked to folklore. Some folk knowledge fuels mycophobia and can perpetuate misinformation.

Documentary sources are a critical information source; they contain authoritative information. However, documented knowledge can become outdated. In the UK, mushroom guides might identify a mushroom as poisonous, but a guide in another country might say that a mushroom isn't dangerous as long as it's prepared in the right way.



The body & sensory information. This is incredibly important. Foraging is a physical practice that forces the forager to use all their sensory information: touch, taste and smell are very important. Sensory information must be used alongside other forms of knowledge. Mushroom books contain vivid descriptions of the sensory impact of mushrooms.

Participating in communities: there is a long history of fungi groups, on and offline e.g. facebook groups. Some are only for the scientific identification of mushrooms, others are about foraging and eating mushrooms. There is always the potential that these groups can share poor-quality information. Groups have very specific rule that many photos of a mushroom must be shared in order to invite others to identify a mushroom.

Technologies: AI and social media are affecting the information landscape of mushrooms, e.g. AI image tools to identify mushrooms. AI tools can't engage in sensory information, so they tend to be very bad at identifying mushrooms. Content creators are active on social media to share mycology.

Each of these 6 dimensions could be explored further to investigate aspects of risk in mycology, and could be a rich site of information literacy research.


Monday, March 30, 2026

Breaking through the noise: exploring the role of social media content creators for fitness information literacies, Laura Williams. #Lilac26

 Pam McKinney here, live-blogging from the first day of the Lilac Conference in Sheffield. Laura Williams is a PhD in our home department, the School of Information, Journalism and Communication. Laura started her PhD research in 2020 and is undertaking it part-time while working as a librarian. The theme of Laura's doctoral research is ultra-running, essentially very long-distance running. If you search for ultra-running on social media, you get lots of content of very healthy and fit-looking people.  "Breaking through the noise" is a verbatim quote from one of Laura's participants, as they experience social media as "noisy". The PhD research brings together Laura's interest in sports and fitness with questions about how social media shapes information practices. The research questions were formed out of her own experiences of using social media as a runner, and bring in Laura's professional experiences with IL and IB. Ultrarunning requires the use of a lot of in-depth information in order to cope with the psychological and physiological challenges e.g. pain, digestion, sleep deprivation etc.

Information from bodies is incredibly important for ultrarunners, but they are also taking i information from the landscape and watching the bodies of others. Epistemic, formal information is used, as well as social information, and of course a lot of social media information. The presentation focuses on the problems encountered on social media and how ultrarunners and their coaches navigate these. Takes Lloy'd's research as a framework for the study: Information literacy as a socially enacted practice. It isn't a skills checklist but is relational, situated, embodied and power-laden.

Social media research has focused on social media fitness influencers and content creators, who can be characterised as non-expert and unprofessional, who use social media to market themselves and products produced by partner brands. The information isn't tailored, and can be problematic. However, social media can play an important role in helping people understand their bodies, and can teach people about how to have a healthy body.

Laura observed social media activity on Instagram, and then interviewed people, and will combine these two sets of data together. The observation was ethnographic in data, where Laura engaged with social media and diarised her experiences, including her emotional state. A second stage of 19 interviews with ultrarunners including coaches and influencers, was analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Laura identified 6 aspects of information sharing on Instagram: documenting running practices, sharing opinions and critiquing, talking about problems & challenges, giving advice, promoting products and events and advocacy campaigning. She found 3 ways that information was shared: photographs such as selfies on the run, watches, and running kit "flatlays" where all equipment is laid out on a surface in preparation for a run. They shared video content such as videos of runs, routines, training diary highlights, and finally composite media, which might be things like running data.

Social media noise is created by a combination of information problems (e.g. low-quality information, personal experiences rather than evidence), platform affordance (e.g. addictive nature, echo chamber, impact of algorithms) and social media culture (w.g. running to create content, influencers). Laura had to do a lot of very active searching to find running content from more diverse groups e.g. runners of colour, or muslim runners, or the algorithm would just throw up lots of white, conventionally attractive, young and thin runners. 

The consequences of the noise are mental health problems and becoming burnt out or injured. So what strategies do people adopt to break through the noise? 

Laura identified five strategies and tactics for breaking through the social media noise. People liked to create their communities, acknowledge that every body is different, resisting against platform affordances, being authentic and supporting information literacy: amplifying good quality information, challenging and critiquing poor quality information, advocating for expertise and authenticity. Influencers and content creators can play an important role in supporting information literacy. Participants spoke about a tension between competing for attention but also trying to remain authentic.  Content creators could reduce the impact of social media noise through activities such as teaching runners to understand their bodies, calling out poor-quality information, and sharing transparent training rationales. Laura asserted IL is important in this space, but it is complex on social media. IL is contextual, community-specific and socially constructed.



Critical thinking and dissent: information literacy in a refused knowledge information landscape #LILAC26

Next from me (Sheila) at the LILAC information literacy conference is Critical thinking and dissent: information literacy in a refused knowledge information landscape presented by Madelene Logren (Umea University, Sweden). The abstract is here

Logren started by observing that IL has often been positioned as a solution to the spread of misinformation. However, this assumes that there are shared norms of credibility and authority, but this may not be the case. That leads to the question: What if IL can sometimes contribute to belief in misinfrmation, rather than reducing it? This could happen if people apply IL to e.g. spreading misinformation.
Logren's subject of study was a network of nurses formed during the COVID pandemic. This network critisised Sweden's approach to the pandemic as being unscientific and unethical (e.g. a lack of informed consent for vaccination, ignoring social impact). The network position themselves as being both inside and outside "traditional" healthcare. Most of their activity is online, with some in person protest. Logren's  theoretical framework uses Lloyd's concept of information landscapes (e.g. this book) and Neresini's work on refused knowledge and refused knowledge communities (perhaps this book); thus to examine the refused knowledge information landscape.
Logren's research explores how IL is constituted and enacted within the refused knowledge information landscape of this nurses' network. She collected from the network's accounts on Telegram and Instagram, and analysed a sample of text and images using reflexive thematic analysis.
There are 3 central central themes - being a part of the healthcare system, creating community & producing knowledge, and becoming disallusioned. The themes are within the refused knowledge information landscape and reinforce each other. The network is open to information, drawing on information from alternative sources (such as personal experiences) and also established sources (so they are not stuck in their own bubble - they do engage with opinions unlike their own).
As well as raising their profile on social media, they are also aiming to raise awareness and discussion, posing questions e.g. "What does medical freedom mean?" "How are potential conficts of interests assessed?" 

Logren then talked more about each of her 3 themes. The first theme was being a part of the healthcare system which involved reflection on the professional identity and role of the nurse (e.g. being on the patient's side). They expressed frustration with the healthcare system (saying that it was bad both for staff and patients), and moved from friction/ frustration to refused knowledge (since the nurses' critique is ignored or dismissed by management). "Nurses have a duty to report if something doesn't seem right, We must have critical thinking ..." since the nurse has a responsibility to protect the patient, and take the patient's problem seriously.
Creating community & producing knowledge was the 2nd theme - collecting personal stories as evidence so they can form a collective narrative (this includes health concerns not being taken seriously and also the experience of being silenced). Independent experts who are seen as willing to challenge traditional approaches are seen as authorities. 

The 3rd theme was Becoming Disallusioned. This included critical engagement with information (applying information literacy / critical thinking)  which resulted in reinterpretation of institutional science as untrustworthy. An example quotation was criticising the vaccine roll out because there had not been gold standard (randomised double blind) studies into whether the vaccinations reduce hospitalisation and death.
Thus "critical thinking emerges both as a moral obligation for nurses and as a way to uncover the truth." "IL practices can lead to and sustain belief in refused knowledge". This reinforces the idea that IL is social and situated. Logren's key takeaway was that the "context may shape the meanings and outcomes of information literacy practices" and one can't assume there is a skill deficit.

Links as Evidence, Ads as Clues: Undergraduate Source Evaluation Strategies #LILAC26

a registration desk with a banner saying LILAC information literacy conference and folding panels for notices

I will be liveblogging from the LILAC information literacy conference, which started today and which is at my university, Sheffield University. Dr Pam Mckinney may also do some liveblogging, but not as much as usual as she was a key member of the organising committee and is super busy with that!
My first session is Links as Evidence, Ads as Clues: Undergraduate Source Evaluation Strategies, presented by Alyssa Russo and Lori Townsend (University of New Mexico, USA), also authored by Amy Jankowski and Stephanie Benee. The abstract is here. The slides are at https://bit.ly/ccg_lilac As I'm liveblogging, these are my immediate impressions.

They explained they were grappling with the problem that students wanted to plunge into content without paying attention to the "packaging" - what kind of information it is e.g. article, report (the "container conundrum"). It was easier to identify information genres when pre-digital and gen-AI has intendified the container conudrum, with faked information getting more difficult to detect.
They wanted to find out what the students were doing, so undertook some research. Research questions included how students perceive info online, how do they decide what to trust, what do they consider when making evaluative decisions. The participants were 15 18-23 year old undergraduates. They were 60% female and the demographic mix was a reasonable match to the UNM population. They carried out semi structured interviews, participants were prompted with possible search topics, then they did google searches and followed up websites from that, speaking aloud and responding to questions as they went along. The researchers did thematic analysis with 2 rounds of coding - some data was collected several years ago before gen AI as life, COVID etc. intervened and the analysis is not yet complete.
The presenters showed emerging findings. This included presenting some video clips e.g. Evergreen was saying why they thought an item on the National Geographic website was scholarly (that it was on a site with reputation, that it had quotes, that it was giving data points, that it gave direct links to sites that were .gov) Townsend noted that the presence of links was often treated as like references, and participants saw .gov (or international equivalents) as being more trustworthy. The researchers wanted to know whether students could recognise genres - one student identified something as like a "yelp page for a dog park" which was pretty accurate.
Another example was a participant talking about how they judged sites by the type of adverts e.g. if the adverts were off topic or loud, that put them off, but if the ads were related to the content on the page then that was seen as more trustworthy. Townsend said that participants reacted adversely if there were prominent, loud, pop-up, bait & switch etc. The participants were thinking about WHY the adverts were in that website. The participant Fir gave reasons for why they would trust the website's creator, based on the detailed information (e.g. personal details, a calendar) and the design quality "I think she's actually trying to help people". Hemlock similarly said "Their main goal is making a difference rather than like drawing the eye".
Participants saw the lived experience, with personal stories, as being more trustworthy. Evidence of purpose was therefore important. Talking about an equality website, looking at the list of board directors, participant Hemlock felt that a foundation that drew on personal experiences was more reliable. Hemlock had less trust for a site that emphasised data (bar charts etc.) rather than personal experience. Elm trusted a website that "provides an area for people who are interested to be able to share their stories" - this was seen as a community which was less biased. This issue of bias detection came up, and "opinions" were seen as bad (e.g. one gave an example of not trusting posts from Twitter or Facebook; another thought that big national news site were biased, trying to attract viewers). Another participant talked about why they trusted an article from the Guardian, but said they thought that complete impartiality wasn't possible.
Students reported that they did sometimes check up on things, and whether did depended on the situation. For example Cottonwood said they would check up on things if it was for work, because it might affect people, whereas if it was a university project they might not. However, Birch said that they would check up if it WAS for a university project. Russo noted how the students also brought their own experience (e.g. Birch recognised the Mayo clinic as trustworthy, as her grandmother had been a patient at a Mayo clinic).
In terms of teaching implications, the presenters advocated starting with "what kind of thing is this?" "what is it trying to do?" type questions. Knowing that "scholarly is good" does not help them tell whether something is scholarly or not. Acronyms like SIFT or CRAAP are rather too simplistic, and you have to acknowledge that source evaluation is complex. However, it can be fun working with the students - as they found in this project.
Photo by Sheila Webber: registration desk before registration started

Thursday, March 26, 2026

#LILAC26 preview: information experiences of female engineering students; Learning Sets; Digital literacy

lilac-coloured logo saying LILAC the information literacy conference sheffield and an image of two working women in overalls

I continue sharing previews of Sheffield colleagues' sessions at the LILAC conference . Today's is from Laura Woods, talking about the three sessions she is involved with. Laura writes. 

I am fortunate to be speaking three times at LILAC this year! I’ve never given multiple presentations at a conference before, but all three of my presentations are from entirely separate projects, so I’m excited to be able to bring them all to LILAC. 
My first presentation is on day 1 of the conference, and will present preliminary findings from my PhD research into the information experiences of female engineering undergraduates at UK universities. I am actually revisiting a presentation I gave at LILAC in 2025, which shared results from my pilot study, at an earlier stage of my research. I’m hoping that any attendees who were there in 2025 will be able to see how my research has developed since completing all of my data collection and beginning data analysis.
My second presentation will be in the morning of day 2, where I will be presenting alongside Dr Pam McKinney. We are sharing the results of an Arts Council-funded project, looking at how creative and arts-based activities can be a gateway to digital literacy for older people. This has been a fascinating project that I’ve felt privileged to be part of, so I am looking forward to discussing the project with the LILAC audience. [There will be more about this from Pam, tomorrow!]
Finally, also on day 2, I am hosting a workshop to launch the Information Literacy Group’s (ILG) inaugural LILAC Learning Sets programme. This is a pilot scheme we are launching this year, aimed at enabling LILAC attendees to form connections and sustain these past the end of the conference. If you are attending LILAC and interested in participating in the LILAC Learning Sets, there is still time to sign up for the workshop - but places are limited! To register for the workshop, sign into your account on the LILAC website, then scroll down to “Book your conference sessions”.
Image: this year's LILAC logo, celebrating Sheffield's women of steel

Tuesday, March 24, 2026

#LILAC26 preview: 'All mushrooms are edible but some only once': Exploring conceptualisations of information literacy in risky leisure contexts through hobbyist mycology

a screenshot showing many photos of fungi in the wild

This is the first of a short series previews of talks to be given at the LILAC conference next week by colleagues from Sheffield University. First we have Laura Williams, librarian and doctoral scholar, reflecting on one of her talks (scheduled for next Wednesday): 'All mushrooms are edible but some only once': Exploring conceptualisations of information literacy in risky leisure contexts through hobbyist mycology. Over to Laura!

This LILAC talk about information literacy and mushroom foraging began life as a zine created last year. Last year I found myself developing an interest in fungi, enjoying walks to spot mushrooms as a form of mindfulness. This interest quickly escalated into an obsession. Hundreds of photographs on my phone, reading books and websites to learn how to identify mushrooms, and joining Facebook groups. I do not like eating mushrooms, but I found myself becoming fascinated with the information richness of hobbyist mycology. 
I turned these thoughts into a zine which more broadly explores the information world of hobbyist mycology. The ideas from that zine have now been developed into a conceptual paper focusing on the information literacy aspects and management of the risks associated with foraging. 
I share that story as insight into how I have ended up on the LILAC programme with a presentation which is neither an output from my doctoral research, nor my work as a librarian. Whilst mushrooms may not be directly linked to my doctoral research about information practices in ultramarathon running, there is certainly a connection. 
My doctoral research has also involved in depth exploration of information literacy in an everyday life and leisure setting. The research question explored is how practices of information literacy are used to manage risk in hobbyist mycology. 
This talk will be a conceptual presentation in which I draw upon selected literature about mushroom foraging to identify ways that information literacy practices are enacted. I draw upon Annemaree Lloyd’s work around information literacy as a socially constructed practice and the work of Alison Hicks on risk-informed information practices. As the title of my talk suggests, mushroom foraging could be considered a risky hobby, with risk of illness or even death from accidental poisoning. 
The talk explores social, cultural and technological factors through which information literacy is enacted. Hobbyist mycology involves many forms of information as part of decision making and negotiating uncertainty. However, little is currently known about the ways information literacy is enacted within these different information activities, and other risky leisure activities. 
Through the provocation of ‘all mushrooms are edible but some only once’ this paper calls for the information literacy community to look towards a rich, overlooked site for understanding every day and leisure information literacy. 
For a researcher who is reaching the final stages of PhD life, writing this abstract for LILAC was an opportunity to find out what would happen if I was bold enough to stray beyond my comfort zone. To find out whether I can take a different question in another space within leisure information, review the literature, explore different theories and present my ideas to an audience.
Screenshot by Laura Williams, showing one of the mushroom folders on her phone.

Friday, February 06, 2026

New articles: immigrants' information needs; scholarly misconduct

a snowy bush in the foreground and at the side and in the mid distance a house with one window lit and a snowy roof and it is night time

- Shahid, S.H. & Sinnamon, L. (2026). A meta-ethnographic synthesis of researchers' views on scholarly misconduct in the health sciences. Library & Information Science Research, 48(1), Article 101399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2026.101399 ("Complimentary access" which I think is free access for a limited period)
"the three forms of misconduct of most concern to researchers are fabrication and falsification, plagiarism, and unethical authorship, while emerging issues include power manipulation and failure to report integrity concerns." Although the focus is health sciences, I would think the findings are of interest/concern in other subjects too.

- Ahmadinia, H. (2026). Belonging through information: Mapping immigrant integration needs in Nordic societies. Library & Information Science Research, 48(1), Article 101400 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2026.101400 (Open access)
"The findings show that difficulties in locating reliable information, limited access to familiar languages, and fragmented institutional communication constrain participation across daily life. Participants often relied on informal networks to compensate for unclear or inaccessible official information."
Photo by Sheila Webber: snow, a few weeks ago, January 2026

Monday, November 17, 2025

New articles: Health students information behaviour; Government information use; Interpreting positive feedback

two pink roses and a pink rosebud on a climbing rose with a park setting in the background

The latest issue of the open access journal Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, Vol. 20 No. 3 (2025), includes:
- Feel Good Incorporated: Using Positively Framed Feedback in Library Instruction Course Evaluations Using a Survivorship-Bias Lens by Benjamin Grantham Aldred
- "We Don't Like Unanswered Questions”: Information Practices of Students Transitioning to Clinical Education by Nena Schvaneveldt ("Students’ information practices are characterized by three themes. They are motivated to build competency to provide patient care; they operate in dual roles as student and clinician; and they navigate ambiguity, uncertainty, and doubt. They were able to describe the way they experienced information, problems they solved, and the development over time."
- Government Information Use by First-Year Undergraduate Students: A Citation Analysis by Sanga Sung, Alexander Deeke
Go to https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/eblip/index.php/EBLIP/issue/view/1974
Photo by Sheila Webber: autumn roses, October 2025

Friday, October 10, 2025

Recent articles: information behaviour on Tiktok; Misinformation in Brazil; genAI and feeling

photo of a small tree in the park with a squirrel perched on it

These are all open access
- Hendrickx, J. (2024). ‘Normal news is boring’: How young adults encounter and experience news on Instagram and TikTok. New Media & Society, 27(10), 5736-5754. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241255955
- Hassoun, A., Borenstein, G., Osborn, K., McAuliffe, J., & Goldberg, B. (2024). Sowing “seeds of doubt”: Cottage industries of election and medical misinformation in Brazil and the United States. New Media & Society, 27(10), 5710-5735. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241255379
- Given, L. M., Polkinghorne, S., & Ridgway, A. (2025). ‘I think I misspoke earlier. My bad!’: Exploring how generative artificial intelligence tools exploit society’s feeling rules. New Media & Society, 27(10), 5525-5545. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448251338276
Photo by Sheila Webber: spot the squirrel, October 2025

Tuesday, October 07, 2025

Information Literacy & Information Behaviour in performing arts

photo of a framed photo that shows the boathouse building reflected in the water and with wintery trees either side
An interesting lengthy blog post from an arts librarian, reviewing some literature on the information behaviour of practitioners and students in performing arts, and adding her own experience to draw some conclusions. 
Ross, C. (2025, October 2). Reframing Traditional Models: Research Needs in the Performing Arts. ACRLog. https://acrlog.org/2025/10/02/reframing-traditional-models-research-needs-in-the-performing-arts/ 
One article she cites is: 
Fleming-May, R. A. (2025). The information needs and behaviours of creative artists: A meta-ethnography of research, 2019-24. Information Research, 30(CoLIS), 551-566. https://doi.org/10.47989/ir30CoLIS52315 
Photo by Sheila Webber: old photo of the Boathouse in Bamberg, September 2025

Monday, May 26, 2025

Information Matters in Canada

Aged stones with pine cones piled on them in a Chinese garden

A special issue of open-access Information Matters has numerous short articles focused on Canadian perspectives on Information Science. It includes:
- Stepping Up to BAT: Inspiration for a Research Process Model by Valerie Nesset
- Health Information Without Borders: The Struggles and Strategies of Older Chinese Adults in Canada by Xiaoqian Zhang, Yi Wan
- Information in Times of Crisis: Learning Together by Lisa Nathan, Luanne Sinnamon, Rachael Huegerich
- Information Literacy Instruction in Canadian Libraries by Heidi Julien
Go to https://informationmatters.org/si-canadian-perspective/
Photo by Sheila Webber: Dr Sun Yat-Sen Classical Chinese Garden, Vancover, Canada, May 2024

Wednesday, May 21, 2025

30 years of Information Research

branches of young horse chestnut leaves against a blue sky
The open access journal Information Research is celebrating 30 years of high quality publication with a special issue (Vol 30 no. 2, 2025). Information Research has maintained this quality without charging author fees. The issue includes:
- A Reflection on 30 Years of Information Research with Professor Tom Wilson (Crystal Fulton interviews founder and researcher, Professor Tom Wilson)
- Information Research at 30: its role as a diamond open access journal supporting scholarly communication in library and information science by JungWon Yoon, James E. Andrews, EunKyung Chung
- An examination of Wilson’s Concept of Information Need: implications by Charles Cole
- Expanding Wilson’s information behaviour model using social cognitive theory: A case study by Peymon Montazeri
- 30 years of Information Research papers citing Professor Tom D. Wilson: a bibliometric analysis by Tanja Svarre, Birger Larsen
- A 24-Year Bibliometric Analysis of the Journal Information Research: Insights from CiteSpace by Lin Wang, Yiyu Chen
- Searching for Information Research: A bibliometric analysis celebrating 30 years of a pioneering open access journal (1995-2024) by Gustaf Nelhans, Camilla Lindelöw, Pablo Lillo Cea, Marco Scirone, Rui José António , Björn Hammarfelt
- Tom Wilson and Information Research: Pioneers of the diamond open access by Jose-Vicente Rodriguez-Munoz, Francisco Javier Martinez Mendez, Pedro-Manuel Diaz-Ortuno, Gregorio Moya-Martinez, Rosana Lopez-Carreno
- Information Research comes to Borås by Karen Nowé Hedvall et al.
Go to https://publicera.kb.se/ir/issue/view/3787
Photo by Sheila Webber: young chestnut leaves, April 2025

Monday, May 19, 2025

Information Behaviour research review

photo of a few yellow peony flowers and one has a bee collecting pollen

A useful, scholaly open access review:
Huvila, I & Gorichanaz, T. (2025). Trends in information behavior research, 2016–2022: An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 76(1), 216–237. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24943
"We reviewed 1270 articles in the field published in the years 2016–2022 and identified seven emerging trends: The CoVID-19 Pandemic, Diversity and Inclusion, Embodiment, Misinformation and Trust, Social Q&A Websites, Collaboration, and Information Creation. The reviewed literature and trends are discussed in relation to their significance for information, earlier review of information behavior research, and the long-debated issue of theory-driven versus atheoretical research in the field."
Photo by Sheila Webber: yellow peonies, April 2025

Wednesday, May 14, 2025

Media Literacy research

close up photo of pink crab apple blossom

There is a new batch of research studies from Ofcom, the United Kingdom's communications watchdog that also has responsibility for Media Literacy. These are high quality quantative and qualitative research reports that are published annually. The participants are all UK residents.
- Adults media literacy research (quantative data on use of digital media, there is a dashboard that you can use) https://www.ofcom.org.uk/media-use-and-attitudes/media-habits-adults/adults-media-use-and-attitudes
- Adults Media Lives (qualitative study: they interview "a panel of 20 people who represent a broad cross-section of the UK population" most of whom have been participating in this annual study for 15 years) https://www.ofcom.org.uk/media-use-and-attitudes/media-habits-adults/media-lives
- Children's media literacy research (children = below 18 years: quantative data on use of digital media, there is a dashboard that you can use) https://www.ofcom.org.uk/media-use-and-attitudes/media-habits-children/children-and-parents-media-use-and-attitudes-report-2025
- Children's Media Lives (qualitative study: started in 2014 "a longitudinal study tracking the media behaviours, experiences and attitudes of a group of children aged between eight and 17, from all over the UK and with a variety of backgrounds.) One snippet about the type of media they consume "Children's feeds were dominated by short, loud, fastpaced and contextless videos." https://www.ofcom.org.uk/media-use-and-attitudes/media-habits-children/childrens-media-lives
Photo by Sheila Webber: crab apple blossom, April 2025

Wednesday, May 07, 2025

Theory in information behaviour

Part of Tower Bridge with cherry blossom trees
The 2013 book edited by Professor Tom Wilson, Theory in information behaviour research, is free of charge from Draft2digital. It has chapters on various relevant theoretical frameworks including activity theory, critical theory, personal construct theory, personality theory, practice theory, social cognitive theory and social phenomenology.
Go to https://www.draft2digital.com/book/1546489#ebook
Photo by Sheila Webber: Tower Bridge and cherry trees, April 2025